is it just me?

[magicicada]

has anyone else had these questions? or better still any answers?

1. so, how do the sunnis and shi'ites tell each other apart? are there major racial differences? is it just clothing?

followup:
if it is just a matter of clothing, why not carry a second 'hat' or ID in order to switch off and get through checkpoints.

if this is a religious thing, is the idea of conversion unheard of or unacceptable?


2. Accepting that a switch to ethanol based on corn may raise food prices significantly, is it possible that there is a 'sweet spot' where price supports on sugar are dropped and corn syrup and high fructose corn syrup are removed from foods in favor of their old school counterpart?

followup:
if you believe that high fructose corn syrup is responsible for much of the obesity in the U.S., is it possible that a drop in obesity might result - leading to lower medical costs, which would put back into the economy the money that the higher food prices have removed.


----

these might be dumb questions and that is why i'm not hearing anyone ask them, but i'm getting tired of debating them inside my own head. question 1 is something i've never heard addressed anywhere, as if it is not even a matter to be questioned, but why? haven't enemies always tried to sneak into one another's camps? how do you know one side from another?

question 2 is because i have heard vast amounts of discussion on the economics of ethanol, the health effects of high fructose corn syrup, and the economics of obesity and i'm wondering if there is a good logical reason why no one has put all these together.

p.s. i'm also really sick of doing french journals.

Comments

[peacockharpy.livejournal.com]

On question 2: Oddly enough, you can make ethanol out of sugar cane, too -- and the process is cheaper than it is for corn. (There was an article in the paper about it this morning, coinciding with the Prez's visit to South America -- Brazil makes ethanol out of sugar cane.)

I have read that, at the moment, ethanol costs more petroleum to produce than the amount it replaces. Farming corn is a very petroleum-dense process.

On question 1, which I'm in no way qualified to answer: I don't know about visual differences, but I do know that deeply held traditions of that sort (A) won't be given up easily and (B) will become more deeply entrenched if persecution/attack is part of the mix. Having an "other" to point to is one easy way for a group to define itself: "Look, we aren't THEM!" You can see the same thing play out in the neoconservative Christian right in the United States; they ring the "we're persecuted" chimes all the time, because it gets the faithful to stick with them.

[penguinicity.livejournal.com]

Ooh, #2 is a good question. Moving corn into fuel production resulting in cane sugar going back into food is an interesting possibility. Unfortunately, a lot of food policy is driven by lobbying for specific political interests rather than by a big picture approach, and that may be why there isn't much talk about those connections. I wonder how much favoring corn over sugarcane is due to a) corn grows more places than sugarcane, b) the corn growing states had better politicians than the sugar growing states, and c) sugarcane grows in places like Cuba that US policy doesn't want to support economically.

[peacockharpy.livejournal.com]

Oh, and on high fructose corn syrup and obesity:

We are doing our best to cut HCFS out of our diet, because we've read that it isn't processed in the same way that sugar is and that it can contribute to diabetes, etc.

However.

I think the obesity epidemic in America is only partially related to HFCS. I think it's far more related to the fact that we have a surplus of food at very low prices, and the lowest-priced foods (which are also the most convenient) are the ones laden with preservatives and HFCS. But mostly it's amounts. I did Weight Watchers for a good long while (I need to get back on it) and that was the eye-opener for me, measuring actual serving sizes. We serve ourselves HUGE portions of food, which wouldn't be bad if the huge portions were, say, vegetables, but what we're serving out is meat and starch and sugar (or HFCS...).

It's more expensive and more trouble to try and avoid HFCS, and it typically means a lot more cooking from scratch. Which we do, by and large, but I recognize that it would be a stumbling block for a lot of people.

No answers, just musing. :)

[cadrys.livejournal.com]

(1) Based on my incomplete research, the Sunni/Shi'a split is an identity thing as much as anything else. People won't surrender that. [One of the key splits is around the "3rd Imam", whom the Shi'a venerate as a Prophet IIRC.] While both are Islam, they're not really reconcilable.

(2) Maybe. It'll never happen though--WAY too much money in farm subsidies in both sugar AND corn. If the feds (either party) were serious about relations wtih South America, ending sugar protectionism would be a huge step. They're not and it won't.

(3) HFCS is evil evil evil. Nevermind obesity, outright diabetes has spiked hard lately, and shows no sign of slowing down. Yes, there IS a good link there, IMAO. [Our in-house crusade is removal of as much sugar as possible from our diets, and HFCS is Right Out.]

Not just you

[fizzgig-bites.livejournal.com]

1. so, how do the sunnis and shi'ites tell each other apart? are there major racial differences? is it just clothing?

You listen to the wrong news. NPR Radio frequently discusses this. It's usually in the context of a reporter fitting in or people modifying their behavior or appearance to get by. It also comes into play of mixed neighborhoods going on way or the other and neighbors trying to fit in until they can move.

From what I remember. There is a lot of weight of colors of bands worn around the wrists. This is changed periodically to shake out the 'other' so they know who the enemies are. There are also ring placements. Certain traditions can also revel what side you are on as well. A stricter view will have you home well before sunset while the other will have you home at sunset.

Appearance at check points is constantly changed.

Conversion is not likely as it is punishable by death and carried out by family and tribe.

2. is because i have heard vast amounts of discussion on the economics of ethanol, the health effects of high fructose corn syrup, and the economics of obesity and i'm wondering if there is a good logical reason why no one has put all these together.

Again, from NPR Radio, soybeans and sugar cane are the best ethanol raw materials. There is a crisis about corn and many scientists have pointed out that if the price of corn goes up, sugar will be cheaper and maybe we can get the Real Coke Classic back. Soybeans are the best materials for ethanol production however soybeans are not as common as corn and there is the lack of tradition for growing it. Supposedly, soybeans are more expensive and harder to grow. I personally disagree. Soybeans are harder to pick and process (follow the money...)

This also brings up the point that just because we know something is good for us, doesn't mean we will do it. Just think of all the poor children who will starve because they didn't get their shot of high fructose corn syrup today. How could you?!?

For the record, it's pretty much banned from the house. I actually have a withdrawal reaction from the stuff. It's like crack to me. The more I have it, the more I want it. When I don't have it, for two to three days, I jones badly for sweets and binge in the process. It's evil. After three days, I don't want sweets at all. Oh, and when I do have sweets again, it like sucking on a lemon... Ok, I'm soapboxing...

[auryn29a.livejournal.com]

1. My little bit of research suggests that the only difference is religious. Which, I guess can be a big difference. It's essentially like the difference between protestant christians and catholics. They have different rites and recognize different things as being "true." It looks like in general, although Sunnis want to convert non-muslims to Islam, Shi'ites are more concerned with turning other muslims into Shi'ites.