magicicada: (Default)
[personal profile] magicicada
[livejournal.com profile] cislyn pointed me towards a very useful article on the Piraha indians.

Under Whorf's theory, people are only capable of constructing thoughts for which they possess actual words. In other words: Because they have no words for numbers, they can't even begin to understand the concept of numbers and arithmetic.

if there was ever a way to describe why everyone should learn a second language, this is it. this is why i study french. this is why my daughter will be learning spanish. learning a new language enables new thoughts which would be difficult or impossible to form without the words to express them.

Discuss.

Date: 2006-05-10 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sensational.livejournal.com
Whorf has, at this point, been pretty much thoroughly debunked. There have been several experiments that prove that people can actually have concepts in their heads for which they don't have words, that words don't define how we think.

I don't have references handy and I'm far too lazy to look them up right now, but if you're curious, there are some experiments having to do with color and the whole Sapir-Whorf thing. Be careful when looking, though--there are some early color word experiments that seem to support S-W, but later on they're redone correctly to show that S-W is mostly crap.

Really, it's kind of unfortunate the way that the S-W hypothesis is used to demonstrate just HOW DIFFERENTLY some cultures THINK, by GOLLY, when really? We're all the same everywhere.

Also, if that kind of thing interests you, there's this great, funny collection of essays by Geoffrey Pullum called The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language that touches on this and other things in a very entertaining way. :)

Date: 2006-05-10 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gardenwaltz.livejournal.com
i have heard a lot of argument against the language = thought theory, including the great eskimo hoax, but i think this article makes valid points about the lack of numbers in the language.

Date: 2006-05-10 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knobody.livejournal.com
but english has more words than any other language. that's why we amerkins are all so smart! we have the most thoughts!

Date: 2006-05-10 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gardenwaltz.livejournal.com
most potential for thought doesn't equal most thoughts ;).

Date: 2006-05-10 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cislyn.livejournal.com
What I find most fascinating about the Piraha is the lack of subordinate clauses - for some reason the loose vocabulary of numbers seems to captivate more people. I guess it's easier to simply say "they don't count" than "they don't reference things in relation to other things" (yeah, that even sounds clunky to me) and so it stands out more as an easy point of reference for how they're different.

My take on the whole thing is that it's terribly curious and interesting. I think that language and thought and culture are all wound up in a big, tangled ball. How the separate threads of each merge and interact is what gets me - as far as I know, nowhere else in the world do people not use subordinate clauses in their grammar. That's ... really neat. And yes, learning a new language helps to put a new perspective on the world. But then, I'm the chick who believes that in order to understand the ancient Greeks well you ought to read ancient Greek, so that's no surprising sentiment coming from me.

Date: 2006-05-12 09:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eugie.livejournal.com
On a related but not-at-all-the-same note, babies are able to hear and distinguish between every single intonation that humans make in our myriad languages, but we lose that ability and become only able to distinguish the ones in the language(s) we're exposed to growing up.

I've noticed there are some tonal differences that I can hear--having grown up around both English and Chinese speakers--that the hubby can't.

Another argument for having kids be exposed to as many languages as possible.

Date: 2006-05-13 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrue.livejournal.com
Those tonal difference are a godsend!

So, I've got a smattering of several languages : German, French, Spanish, Irish Gaelic, and Mandarin Chinese...

Mandarin is a nightmare, because my ear isn't accustomed to looking for aforementioned tonal clues. Because I didn't get raised around half a dozen languages, syntax is terribly difficult in everything but my primary language.

That said, one needs to be exposed to several languages as a part of their education to encourage more flexible thought. Accustomed to putting language in several combinations will lead to more agile thought. Don't limit them to Spanish. 20% of the planet speaks some Chinese dialect. Get at least 2 in there.

YMMV, as I blame trying to learn several languages for exercising my brain. It *could* just be that more stimulus is good, and TV bad. :)

Date: 2006-05-13 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gardenwaltz.livejournal.com
i won't limit her to spanish, but we're definitely going to start with only 1 new language at a time. she's still not quite ready to make choices like this for herself, and i don't want to push too hard.

Date: 2006-05-13 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldgrue.livejournal.com
Kids are so durable, the fear is going to be what *you* can handle. :)
Don't be fooled - your little one will do fine.


Profile

magicicada: (Default)
magicicada

March 2011

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 08:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios